2025, Vol. 7, Issue 9, Part C

Aim: The definition of a system, in short, is a group of things that connect and form a coherent whole. In order to avoid randomness, the Wagner Group (W.G.), officially known as the private military company PMC Wagner, attempted to function as an organization inside the national system. Although the fact that the armed group is not recognized by the country (making it simple to deny their actions) is one of its primary benefits, it also requires the nation's logistical support. That dilemma is one of the reasons for the formation of the armed groups and the reason for their destruction, too. Our paper tries to analyze that dilemma from the perspectives of three different sciences: ecology, administration, and politics.
Methodology: To examine and respond to some inquiries concerning the W.G., the paper will employ synergistic thinking (relating to the interaction or cooperation of two or more ideas to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects). Is W.G. a real system/organization on ecological, administrative, and political levels? Why was the W.G. formed and destroyed?
Results: W.G. and any PMCs are not a system or a part of it according to ecology, administration, and political sciences for many reasons, and that might be the reason for the end of that kind of non-state armed groups (NSAG).
Interpretation: The rational reason after applying synergistic thinking to analyze that dilemma is that every system has a structure determined by its components and makeup. Countries have created armed groups to be excluded from their systems to avoid the responsibility; this is why they were destroyed and not sustained, much like the immune system attacks a foreign cell because it is not a part of the body's system.